KJSEA Integrated Science (905): What's in Paper 1 and Paper 2
7 September 2026

Illustration
Integrated Science at Grade 9 KJSEA level is assessed under paper code 905, and it's a subject where a common misunderstanding causes real problems when schools set their own mock or term exams: teachers sometimes try to write a "Paper 2" for Integrated Science expecting it to be a second written theory paper. It isn't. Understanding exactly what PP1 contains, and what PP2 actually is, changes how a school should plan its internal assessment calendar for this subject.
The structure of PP1
PP1 is the written theory paper, and its structure is fixed and specific.
| Section | Format | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Section A | 30 MCQ | 30 |
| Section B | Structured questions, Q31–40 | 40 |
| Total | 70 |
The paper runs 1 hour 40 minutes, and learners answer all questions — there are no optional sections and nothing to choose between.
Section A's 30 MCQs cover breadth across the Integrated Science curriculum, testing recall and application of concepts efficiently across many topics in a single sitting. Section B's ten structured questions (numbered 31 through 40) go deeper, requiring learners to reason through problems, apply scientific principles to given scenarios, and produce written explanations rather than select an answer.
This two-part design mirrors a pattern common across KJSEA science and applied-subject papers: a broad, fast-moving objective section followed by a narrower, deeper structured section. For teachers, it means learners need two distinct kinds of practice — quick, accurate recall and application under MCQ time pressure, and slower, more deliberate written reasoning for the structured items.
Command verbs to prepare for in Section B
Genuine KJSEA-style structured items rarely ask learners to simply state a fact. They wrap content in a scenario and ask learners to act on it using specific command verbs: explain why, compare, analyse, investigate, demonstrate, work out, discuss. A learner who has only memorised definitions will struggle with a Section B question that asks them to analyse a scenario or work out a consequence, even if they know the underlying content well. Practice questions should be written the same way — as scenario-based prompts using these verbs — rather than as bare recall questions, so learners get used to applying knowledge rather than reciting it.
What PP2 actually is
This is the point most worth getting right. PP2 for Integrated Science is a lab practical component, assessed as school-based continuous assessment. It is not a sit-down written theory exam that a school schedules alongside PP1 during a term's exam week.
That distinction matters practically. If a school's exam timetable includes "905 PP2" as a second theory paper written under exam-hall conditions, that paper does not correspond to anything KNEC actually administers as a term exam. PP2 lives in the practical, hands-on, continuously assessed side of the subject — observed lab work and practical tasks conducted over time, not a single written script produced on exam day.
What this means for setting term and mock exams
Because PP2 isn't a written exam schools sit as a timed paper, the practical implication for internal assessment is straightforward: when a school wants to give learners a realistic, KJSEA-aligned Integrated Science exam experience, PP1's theory format — Section A MCQ, Section B structured, 70 marks, 1h40m — is the model to follow. A school-set "Integrated Science exam" should be built to that shape, not to an invented second paper that has no equivalent in the real assessment.
Practical/lab competencies should still be assessed, but through the school's own continuous assessment activities across the term — observed lab tasks, practical write-ups, skills checklists — rather than as a bolt-on written "Paper 2" during exam week.
A quick reference for planning
| Element | PP1 | PP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Written theory exam | School-based lab practical |
| Format | MCQ (Section A) + structured (Section B) | Continuous assessment, not a single written paper |
| Marks | 70 | Not applicable in the same way — assessed as ongoing practical work |
| Duration | 1h40m | Ongoing, not a fixed sitting |
| What schools should replicate for a mock | Yes — this is the model for a written mock exam | No — replicate through practical activities, not a written script |
Takeaway
905's PP1 is the well-defined written half: 30 MCQ worth 30 marks, ten structured questions worth 40 marks, 70 marks total in 1 hour 40 minutes, answer all. PP2 is not a second written exam — it's school-based lab practical work assessed as continuous assessment. When a school sets a mock or term paper for Integrated Science, PP1's format is the one to replicate; PP2 belongs in ongoing practical assessment, not exam week.
Practice questions on this
Free questions with worked marking schemes, grouped by topic.
More on KNEC Assessment Formats
Ready to build a KNEC-format exam paper for your class? Start your free PaperSetter trial.